Repulsive guidance molecules lock growth differentiation factor 5 in an inhibitory complex.

Repulsive guidance molecules (RGMs) are cell surface proteins that regulate the development and homeostasis of many tissues and organs, including the nervous, skeletal, and immune systems. They control fundamental biological processes, such as migration and differentiation by direct interaction with the Neogenin (NEO1) receptor and function as coreceptors for the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/growth differentiation factor (GDF) family. We determined crystal structures of all three human RGM family members in complex with GDF5, as well as the ternary NEO1-RGMB-GDF5 assembly. Surprisingly, we show that all three RGMs inhibit GDF5 signaling, which is in stark contrast to RGM-mediated enhancement of signaling observed for other BMPs, like BMP2. Despite their opposite effect on GDF5 signaling, RGMs occupy the BMP type 1 receptor binding site similar to the observed interactions in RGM-BMP2 complexes. In the NEO1-RGMB-GDF5 complex, RGMB physically bridges NEO1 and GDF5, suggesting cross-talk between the GDF5 and NEO1 signaling pathways. Our crystal structures, combined with structure-guided mutagenesis of RGMs and BMP ligands, binding studies, and cellular assays suggest that RGMs inhibit GDF5 signaling by competing with GDF5 type 1 receptors. While our crystal structure analysis and in vitro binding data initially pointed towards a simple competition mechanism between RGMs and type 1 receptors as a possible basis for RGM-mediated GDF5 inhibition, further experiments utilizing BMP2-mimicking GDF5 variants clearly indicate a more complex mechanism that explains how RGMs can act as a functionality-changing switch for two structurally and biochemically similar signaling molecules.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Spinal Surgery: What Is the Fusion Rate and Do They Cause Cancer?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the fusion rate using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) in spinal surgery and to estimate the risk of cancer subsequent to their use. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: rhBMP may obviate the need for iliac crest bone graft harvest and provides similar or higher fusion rates than autologous bone graft. Recently, there are concerns that rhBMPs may either cause cancer or accelerate progression. METHODS: Patients were treated by 2 spine surgeons between 2002 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were patients who resided in the state of Victoria, Australia, undergoing lumbar fusion (anterior, lateral, posterior, and posterolateral) with rhBMP [either rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or rhBMP-7 (OP-1)]. Exclusion criteria were patients who reported having an invasive cancer diagnosis before the spinal fusion procedure. The occurrence of incident cancers was obtained from record linkage to the Victorian Cancer Registry. RESULTS: A total of 527 patients were included in the cohort, with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years (1.8-11.5). Patients received Infuse in 77% of cases and OP-1 in 23%. The mean Infuse does was 10.2  mg (2.5-48.0) and 3.3  mg (1.7-6.6) for OP-1. There was no significant difference in fusion rates between Infuse (90.1%) and OP-1 (91.9%) (P = 0.42). The overall success of interbody fusion with rhBMP was 93.5% at 12 months. Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed with an invasive cancer since treatment (20 Infuse and 7 OP-1 patients). Comparing the observed numbers in our study cohort with those expected on the basis of the Victorian population's age and sex-specific rates, we observed that the study cohort was not at a significantly increased risk of cancer. The standardized incidence ratio for cancer overall (of any type) was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.56-1.21]. CONCLUSION: Off-label use of rhBMP provided high fusion rates with no evidence of a significantly increased risk of cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.